Futuremark Xfx Radeon Rx 580 Gts Black Edition 8gb Gddr5 Amd Graphics Card Rx580p8dbd6 Review
The $one,199 Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Founders Edition is a fantastic video-carte option if you're on a window-shopping spree. One time real greenbacks changes hands, though, most of us will dial that back to a mid-level breadsaver like the new $279 AMD Radeon RX 590 for our gaming needs. Thinking of the Radeon RX 590 as a souped-up Radeon RX 580 is accurate, since that'due south exactly what it is, as the GPU core is unchanged. We already like the Radeon RX 580 for what it is: a adept graphics card for high-frame-rate 1080p and fluid 1440p gaming in today's AAA titles. The Radeon RX 590 is an even improve performer; it showed double-digit percentage gains in our tests over the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060, which remains, stubbornly, in a similar price bracket. The Radeon RX 580 costs substantially less, so if yous want the near functioning for your dollar, we give it the edge, but the Radeon RX 590 is the new midrange king if raw speed, regardless of ability draw or overall value, is your target.
You Can Trust Our Reviews
Since 1982, PCMag has tested and rated thousands of products to help you lot make amend buying decisions. (Come across how we test.)
Say How-do-you-do to Polaris...Once again
The "Polaris" architecture on which the Radeon RX 590 is based debuted in 2016 on the Radeon RX 480. (Hit the review link for the full details on Polaris.) That graphics processor (GPU) was succeeded in 2017 by the Radeon RX 580. Both cards shared the number of compute units (36), stream processors (2,304), and texture units (144), and both had a 256-flake retentiveness autobus, making them much the same at heart. Most, if not all, of the performance boost from the Radeon RX 580 came from its higher clocks. AMD, in short, got better at making its own product.
Similar Products
History repeated itself in late 2018. The Radeon RX 590 has the same overall specifications as the Radeon RX 580 (and, consequently, the Radeon RX 480). What makes it slightly more than radical than the RX 480-to-RX 580 transition is its motility to a 12nm FinFET fabrication process. It's arguably a tweaked version of the 14nm procedure that was used for the Radeon RX 480 and the Radeon RX 580, but let technicalities exist technicalities.
The newer procedure lets AMD eke out fifty-fifty more functioning from the Polaris architecture. The Radeon RX 590 has a core clock that is untouchable past Radeon RX 580 standards: 1,469MHz. That'due south a 12 per centum increment over the one,257MHz clock on the Radeon RX 580, and a 31 percent increase over the 1,120MHz clock of the Radeon RX 480. I'll detail later in this review how much overhead remains in the Radeon RX 590 for overclocking.
Despite its more than avant-garde fabrication, the Radeon RX 590's boosted core clock comes at a cost. Its board power rating is a whopping 225 watts, the very same carried by the gobs-faster Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Founders Edition. The Radeon RX 580 was rated for about eighteen percentage less power (185 watts), although its core clock was just about 14 percent lower. These diminishing returns are a tell-tale indicator that AMD is stretching the limits of the Polaris GPU architecture. (The Radeon RX 480 was rated for but 150 watts.)
But AMD's focus with the Radeon RX 590 isn't on performance per watt: Information technology's on operation per dollar. In that location's no camouflaging that the Radeon RX 590's selling point is its price. As I type this, AMD is sweetening the deal with a promo that gets yous three free games with a Radeon RX 590 buy, and they're not no-proper name titles: Tom Clancy's The Division 2, Resident Evil 2, and Devil May Weep 5 are all AAA-level. It's smart marketing and a simple reminder that, when budgeting for a new gaming rig or graphics card, you as well need to budget for, well, games. This kind of promo is a potential deal-maker in the Radeon RX 590'due south cost-conscious market segment.
The XFX Difference
XFX is an AMD board partner; the company takes AMD'southward reference GPUs and designs its own graphics cards around them. That includes (but isn't limited to) the cooling solution, the circuit-board pattern, the power delivery, and aesthetics. AMD doesn't produce a Radeon RX 590 board of its own, and so there's no "baseline" menu to reference for comparisons.
Prices for Radeon RX 590 models range from $259 to $309, with this XFX card, the Radeon RX 590 Fatboy, sitting pretty at AMD's recommended price of $279. The Fatboy is the just Radeon RX 590 model that XFX offers. The Radeon RX 590 Fatboy and near other Radeon RX 590 graphics cards I found were in stock at online due east-tailers similar Newegg as I typed this review. That's a good affair; new graphics cards are frequently backordered for months later on debut. (Nvidia'south GeForce RTX xx serial is a recent case.)
The core clock varied among Radeon RX 590 models I saw from vendors such as Asus and PowerColor. The XFX Radeon RX 590 Fatboy ships at ane,580MHz, a pregnant bump over the 1,469MHz clock AMD lists equally the baseline for the RX 590. In fact, the XFX card had the highest core clock that I saw amidst Radeon RX 590 models bachelor as of this writing. The standard Radeon RX 590 core clock must take been conservative indeed, as all competing cards I found were nearly 100MHz higher, at the minimum.
Taking a Board(walk)
Surveying the competing Radeon RX 590 models, the two-fan cooler on the XFX Radeon RX 590 Fatboy is a mutual approach, although the pricey $309 Asus Strix RX 590 8G Gaming uses a larger three-fan solution. I'll discuss cooling performance later. For now, let's practice a walk-around of the card I accept.
The Radeon RX 590 Fatboy'due south cooling solution and overall lath pattern are by and large identical to those of the XFX Radeon RX 580 GTS XXX Edition. This is a large graphics card for a mid-level performer. At 10.6 inches long, it's virtually an inch longer than the GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition.
The aluminum-finned heatsink and copper heatpipes are plainly visible through its cooling-fan blades...
The carbon-fiber look on the plastic shroud is a dainty detail, but it's difficult to see this pattern in the dark depths of a desktop example.
The four heatpipes are more than plainly visible from the board's bottom edge...
The superlative border shows more heatpipe activity. Note the shroud on the heatsink spreads across the two-slot backplate; this card is 2.1 inches thick, pregnant it will take 2-and-a-half slots in your desktop. It'southward unusual for a midrange graphics card to be that thick. Its four.nine-inch acme is likewise oversize.
Hither y'all tin come across evidence of the Radeon RX 590's high ability requirements, in the grade of an eight-pin and a half dozen-pin power connector...
A blue LED over either connector provides minor visual bling; that's the merely lighting on this card. XFX recommends a minimum power supply rating of 550 watts.
The backplate houses a standard set of video-out ports: an HDMI 2.0b connector, 3 DisplayPort ane.three connectors, and legacy DVI-D.
The aluminum backplate on the underside of the card caters to both force and cooling...
Competing Radeon RX 590 boards also have backplates, and they weren't an uncommon sight on the Radeon RX 580, either. They're good to have for strength/stiffening reasons alone. Information technology's also noteworthy that the Radeon RX 590 Fatboy is backed by a three-year warranty.
Performance Testing
PC Labs ran through a series of DirectX 11- and 12-based synthetic and real-world benchmarks on the XFX Radeon RX 590 Fatboy. The test rig is equipped with an Intel Core i7-8700K processor, 16GB of M.Skill DDR4 memory, a solid-land kick drive, and an Aorus Z370 Gaming seven motherboard.
The analysis will pit the Radeon RX 590 against the GeForce GTX 1060 and the Radeon RX 580, with a smattering of higher-end cards thrown in for good measure out. The realistic gaming resolutions for the Radeon RX 590 are 1080p and 1440p; a 4K resolution is generally out of its reach in today'due south AAA titles without considerably lowering the detail settings.
Note that the Radeon RX 590 Fatboy was left at its default 1,580MHz core clock for all testing. (I'll detail overclocking after this section.) This will be a benchmark-by-benchmark walkthrough, so if you don't care most the blow-by-accident, skip to the conclusion for the summary.
Constructed Benchmarks
3DMark Burn down Strike Ultra
Synthetic benchmarks can be good predictors of real-world gaming performance. Futuremark's circa-2013 Fire Strike Ultra is even so a get-to for 4K-based gaming. We're looking simply at the graphics subscore, not the overall score.
The XFX Radeon RX 590 Fatboy performed almost 12.5 percent meliorate than the XFX Radeon RX 580 GTS XXX Edition, or not quite a one-to-one correlation with its 15.vi percent increment in core clock. On the other hand, the Radeon RX 590 Fatboy crushed the GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition with a 23 percent advantage. All iii cards are cemented in the midrange segment; the GeForce GTX 1070 Founders Edition is clearly in the side by side functioning tier.
3DMark Fourth dimension Spy and Time Spy Farthermost
This is Futuremark's DirectX 12-enabled benchmark for predicting the performance of DirectX 12-enabled games. It uses major features of the API, including asynchronous compute, explicit multi-adapter, and multi-threading.
The gap betwixt the XFX Radeon RX 590 and the GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition is alarmingly halved in this test at the standard setting, and farther reduced to simply nine percentage in the Radeon RX 590's favor at the Extreme setting. A win is a win, nevertheless; the Radeon RX 590 Fatboy is definitively faster than the GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition in both tests, a merits the Radeon RX 580 couldn't make with confidence.
Unigine Superposition
Our last synthetic benchmark is Unigine's 2017 release, Superposition. This benchmark does incorporate ray tracing, just it'south done in software, not hardware, and thus doesn't utilize the RT cores of the RTX 20 serial.
The XFX Radeon RX 590 Fatboy reclaims its twenty-pct-plus lead on the GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition in this benchmark at the 1080p Extreme settings, just it couldn't maintain that at the college resolutions. This isn't the offset time I've seen odd conclusions from the 4K and 8K optimized settings in this benchmark, so let's motility on.
Existent-Earth Gaming
The following benchmarks are games that you can play. The charts themselves will list the settings used (typically the highest in-game presets and, if available, DirectX 12).
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
Foursquare Enix's latest Tomb Raider title is our showtime real-world examination. This game is well-optimized for the PC platform, but very demanding at its higher visual quality settings.
The 1080p resolution is somewhat limited by our test rig's processor. Focusing on the 1440p numbers, the XFX Radeon RX 590 Fatboy demonstrates its biggest proceeds yet over the GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition: 31 per centum.
Given that this game uses a large amount of video retentiveness at the test settings, the Radeon RX 590 Fatboy and Radeon RX 580 GTS Xxx Edition may take held an reward with their 8GB of video retentiveness over the GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition, which has only 6GB of memory. (By the way, if you're because a GeForce GTX 1060, avoid the 3GB versions for this very reason: Games are going to get-go using more and more video memory. The same goes for the Radeon RX 580; avert the 4GB versions. The Radeon RX 590 is only available in 8GB configurations.)
Rise of the Tomb Raider
The 2015 predecessor to Shadow of the Tomb Raider is even so a great criterion.
The disparities between the XFX Radeon RX 590 Fatboy and the GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition aren't as pronounced here as they were in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, only they're still substantial. A 60fps boilerplate at 1440p is noticeably smoother than 51fps.
Far Cry v and Far Cry Primal
The fourth and 5th installments in the Far Cry series are based on DirectX 11, but still demanding. We're looping these benchmark charts together since they benchmark similarly.
At present that's interesting; suddenly the GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition closed the gap with the XFX Radeon RX 590 Fatboy. Let's run into if this continues.
Concluding Fantasy Fifteen
Nosotros'll accept a respite from fps-based benchmarks for Terminal Fantasy XV.
The GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition once again turns the tables on the Radeon RX 590 Fatboy. The earlier 3DMark synthetic tests showed that the AMD card has more than brute processing power, so it's more probable that this benchmark and the Far Weep games above are just meliorate suited to running on Nvidia hardware.
World of Tanks Encore
This is another non-fps-based criterion that'due south available as a costless download. It'southward not super-demanding, but it is still a reliable test.
The downhill slide continues for the XFX Radeon RX 590 Fatboy. It's not a bad performer; it's just not outperforming the GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition equally it predictably should.
Tom Clancy: The Division
A 2016 release that remains tough to handle, here'southward our final DirectX 12-specific game test.
The XFX Radeon RX 590 Fatboy returns to its 20 to 30 percent gains over the GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition.
It's hard to explain all the swings we've seen in the benchmark tests, though i truth survived through all: The GeForce GTX 1060 commonly will be eclipsed past the Radeon RX 590, and not by a lilliputian amount.
There's Always Room for Overclocking
The Radeon RX 590 Fatboy runs at a core (or what XFX calls a "Truthful") clock of ane,580MHz. However, XFX advertises it with an "OC+" rating, meaning information technology's qualified for a balmy overclock. On the Radeon RX 590 Fatboy, it'southward a pocket-sized 20MHz bump on the core and no increase to the memory clock.
I used the AMD WattMan utility to apply the overclock past following the OC+ tutorial on XFX's website. Information technology took about three minutes. Below are the results of earlier-and-after benchmarking. (Note that I ran these benchmarks on a unlike test rig than PC Labs used for the formal benchmarks section in this review, so the numbers aren't comparable. My test rig has a Core i7-7700K processor and 16GB of RAM.)
| RX 590 Fatboy (Overclocked With AMD's WattMan) | RX 590 Fatboy (Stock) | Overclock Vs. Stock | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Ultra (Graphics Score) | iii,671 | 3,681 | < 1% |
| 3DMark Fourth dimension Spy (Graphics Score) | four,857 | iv,790 | +i.4% |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (1,920x1,080, Very High Preset, DX 12) | 87fps | 87fps | Even |
| Rising of the Tomb Raider (3,840x2,160, Very High Preset, DX 12) | 31fps | 31fps | Even |
| Far Cry 5 (1,920x1,080, Ultra Preset) | 81fps | 81fps | Even |
| Far Cry five (3,840x2,160, Ultra Preset) | 30fps | 30fps | Even |
A tiny overclock equates to a tiny functioning gain; the graphics portion of the scores for 3DMark Burn down Strike Ultra and 3DMark Time Spy were each less than two percent higher with the OC+ settings applied. A measurable difference wasn't detectable in the game benchmarks, either. These are hardly unpredictable results for such a small bump on the cadre frequency.
I tried my hand at manually overclocking the Radeon RX 590 Fatboy using my overclocking utility of choice, MSI Afterburner. My goal was a "safe" overclock, one where I'd push button the card every bit far as it could go without increasing the core voltage. I used 3DMark Burn down Strike for stability testing.
I began past bumping the Radeon RX 590 Fatboy'south power limit to its maximum (+50) and and so incrementally increasing the retentivity clock, stopping forth the mode to exercise stability testing. Eventually I reached ii,250MHz from the default clock of two,000MHz. Encouraged by that, I started upping the cadre clock from its base of i,580MHz. The highest stable core clock I reached was 1,637MHz; any higher and the stability test crashed after a few minutes. Every graphics card is different, so you could do better (or worse) than I did.
These are comparative benchmarks showing the operation differences with the Radeon RX 590 Fatboy overclocked using my manual overclock settings versus the stock card:
| RX 590 Fatboy (Overclocked With AMD's WattMan) | RX 590 Fatboy (Stock) | Overclock Vs. Stock | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Ultra (Graphics Score) | 3,917 | iii,681 | +6% |
| 3DMark Time Spy (Graphics Score) | 5,081 | four,790 | +6% |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (1,920x1,080, Very High Preset, DX 12) | 92fps | 87fps | +six% |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (3,840x2,160, Very High Preset, DX 12) | 33fps | 31fps | +6% |
| Far Cry five (one,920x1,080, Ultra Preset) | 85fps | 81fps | +five% |
| Far Weep 5 (3,840x2,160, Ultra Preset) | 32fps | 30fps | +7% |
The 3DMark Fire Strike Ultra graphics score improved half-dozen.4 percent with the manual overclocking. That'due south a respectable gain and cost nothing but about an 60 minutes of trial and error to accomplish. The overclock translated into the real world, too, with both Rise of the Tomb Raider and Far Cry 5 showing average fps gains.
A few extra frames per second at a 1080p resolution may not be noticeable when the Radeon RX 590 is pushing close to triple-digit frame rates in those titles, but information technology doesn't hurt. In a like vein, a few fps isn't enough of a boost to brand either game playable at a 4K resolution with the settings I used. If you lot take the middle ground with a 1440p resolution, however, a few fps should be noticeable given the Radeon RX 590 produces between 50fps and 60fps in these titles at that resolution without overclocking.
The Radeon RX 590 indeed has headroom for overclocking despite the fact its core clock is much higher than that of the Radeon RX 580. Again, I coaxed every bit much functioning as I could without increasing the core voltage, but y'all could probable become farther with more than voltage. In XFX's OC+ tutorial, they plainly state you should take fun overclocking beyond the OC+ settings. That's what it's all near. Don't await to overclocking as a phenomenon solution; if the Radeon RX 590 (or any other graphics card for that thing) isn't fast enough for you out of the box, so it'south not going to exist fast plenty with overclocking, either. Even amidst graphics cards that overclock particularly well, such as the Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 family, the operation gains from overclocking are rarely outside of the single-digit range.
Keep Information technology Cool
With the manual overclocking settings outlined above, I logged a 10-minute (20-loop) run through the 3DMark Fire Strike Stability test to find the core clock stability and GPU temperature of the Radeon RX 590 Fatboy. I did the testing in a 68 degree F room.
The retentivity clock I set (2,250MHz) remained constant throughout, so I left it off the chart. I should have left the core clock off by that same logic; it remained dead-even at 1,637MHz, which is exactly what I was hoping to meet. There's clearly no shortage of ability in this card. The GPU temperature averaged 73 degrees C and peaked at 77 degrees C, both of which are more than adequate.
The twin fans are whisper-quiet. Note the exhaust air goes into the case, so you'll need to ensure good airflow. This cooling blueprint wouldn't be ideal in a cramped case environment. For that, a blower-style cooler like the ane on the GeForce GTX 1060 Founders Edition is ameliorate-suited.
A Skilful Value, But Don't Ignore the RX 580
The AMD Radeon RX 590 brings a compelling value argument to the mid-level graphics card market. Its boilerplate performance gain over the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 6GB was 14 percentage across all our synthetic and existent-world benchmarks. The advantage exceeded xxx percent in several game titles.
Simple economics make gains like that incommunicable to ignore. The $279 price of the XFX Radeon RX 590 Fatboy makes it an easy alternative to the GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, which is holding steady in the $250-to-$300 range. The XFX model nosotros reviewed isn't fifty-fifty the cheapest Radeon RX 590; some were going for $259 at this writing. AMD'south promotion of three free AAA-level titles with a Radeon RX 590 purchase further sweetens the bargain.
The Radeon RX 590 faces its stiffest competition from within its ain house: the existing Radeon RX 580, which tin routinely be found in the lower-$200s (and, as nosotros wrote this, occasionally nether $200 with rebates). The Radeon RX 590 was 12 percent faster overall than Radeon RX 580, which, although significant, isn't likely to make the divergence between playability and unplayability in most gaming scenarios. That's especially truthful for 1080p gaming, where both cards routinely average over 60fps in today'due south titles.
Also in the Radeon RX 580'due south value favor: AMD is running a similar promotion with the Radeon RX 580, in its case for ii free AAA titles. Even if the game titles don't interest you, the performance-per-dollar value however tilts slightly to the Radeon RX 580.
But if you tin can fork over a little extra (but can't stretch to the $350-plus for the coming-to-market place GeForce RTX 2060), the Radeon RX 590 is a worthy upgrade. This is the new rex of the loma among midrange (defined as under-$300) graphics cards from the POV of raw grunt. It even responds well to overclocking for added value and fun. Just sentinel your electricity bill; while information technology won't hit your wallet similar a top-tier carte, its 225-watt power rating will certainly make it consume power like i.
XFX Radeon RX 590 Fatboy
Cons
The Bottom Line
If yous ignore power consumption, the Radeon RX 590 is the best-performing midrange card you can purchase (equally tested in this XFX model), showing double-digit gains over the GeForce GTX 1060. However, the existing Radeon RX 580 has the economic border.
Like What You lot're Reading?
Sign upward for Lab Report to get the latest reviews and top product advice delivered right to your inbox.
This newsletter may contain advertizement, deals, or affiliate links. Subscribing to a newsletter indicates your consent to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You may unsubscribe from the newsletters at whatever time.
Source: https://dfkkwf.is-a-geek.org/reviews/xfx-radeon-rx-590-fatboy
0 Response to "Futuremark Xfx Radeon Rx 580 Gts Black Edition 8gb Gddr5 Amd Graphics Card Rx580p8dbd6 Review"
Post a Comment